Pink Ribbon Deceptions

The Breast Cancer Awareness month is justoppose this bill and other environmental health
about to roll around once more. Where has thelegislation in California. 1
year gone?! There will be coffee mornings, GirlsLet's make it clear...
Night In, Fun Runs and a host of other events toThey weren't required to remove the chemicals...
raise money for Breast Cancer Research.just notify the state and thus consumers, of their
Predictably there will be some major sponsorsinclusion in the products people use on their bodies
among the skin care and cosmetics industry.every day!
Great news!I want to know that if there is the smallest
Bring it on. Except...amount of evidence regarding chemicals linked
While these companies adorn their products withbreast cancer, why isn't the focus on eliminating
Pink Ribbons and many offer a percentage ofthese from daily life? There are more than 200
profits to the cause, many of them also includechemicals that have shown to cause breast
chemicals in their products.There are severalcancer in animals according to research from The
chemical ingredients that may be cause forSilent Spring Institute in May 2007. 2
concern and quite a few that could beThese chemicals include: - pesticides, industrial
contaminated with carcinogens duringsolvents, pharmaceuticals, cosmetic ingredients,
manufacture. Were you aware that somehormones and dyes.
chemicals in skin care products have shown to beIt seems more influence is placed on detection
hazardous to laboratory animals? It seems thatrather than prevention. If this disease is
the self-regulated cosmetic industry cares littlepreventable, surely that is where the focus should
about the results from research.be. At the turn of the century 1 in 20 women
In California, US, in 2005, Senator Carol Migdenwere diagnosed with breast cancer. Now that
sponsored a bill called the California Safefigure is more like 1 in 8. It can't be a coincidence
Cosmetics Act. This bill would mean cosmeticthat the increasing number of chemicals we are
companies who used chemicals in their productsexposed to is not linked to the increase in breast
that had been linked to cancer or birth defectscancer rates. These increases parallel the increase
were obliged to inform the state.in chemical manufacturing since WWII. They
The lobbyists for the cosmetic industry, led byaccumulate in the body and can remain for years
the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Associationif not decades.
(CTFA) arrived on mass at the capitol. AtThis year, when all the hype abounds, take a
legislative hearings, companies including Johnsonmoment to reflect on the products you use and
& Johnson, Mary Kay, L'Oreal, Estee Lauderselect for your family. Choose wisely and avoid
and Neutrogena testified against the bill. Statechemical laden 'Pink Washed' products.
records show Proctor and Gamble - manufactures1) "Lobbying Activity"(online) cal-access.ss.ca.gov
of Max Factor, Cover Girl and SK II - paidlobbying/ "bills/agencies lobbied"
lobbyists from Sacramento more than $250,0002) Cancer, 109 (S12): 2635-2666.
and the CTFA spent a half a million dollars to