Cancer Screening Guidelines May Indicate Health Care Rationing For Everyone

Mammograms are not needed for women in theirhuman element is not a factor to the number
40s with average cancer risk, according to the UScrunchers, but it is to families.
Preventative Services Task Force. ThisOur family had a harrowing brush with breast
government-funded authority issued newcancer many years ago. It was the fall of 1957
guidelines suggesting screening procedures bewhen my mother, then in her early 40s,
dropped even though 40,000 American womendiscovered a lump in her breast. Examinations
die every year from breast cancer. How coulddetermined it was cancer, surgery was
they come to this conclusion and does it suggestrecommended and a radical mastectomy was
full-scale health care rationing is on its way?performed. Afterward, a series of deep x-ray
In addition to advising those in their 40s to foregotreatments followed, which made mom
mammograms, the task force suggests thatextremely ill; however, she fought through the
those ages 50 to 74 skip annual screenings indiscomfort and received the recommended
favor of scheduling them on an every other yeardosage. In those days the survival rates were
basis. At the same time the guidelines advisepretty low, but my mother beat the cancer and
doctors to stop teaching patients how to performdied, just a few years ago, from natural causes
self-examinations.at the age of ninety. Had it not been for early
Are these the recommendations of a physicians'detection and treatment, she would not have
group? Were the findings a result of researchenjoyed all those years and we would have
conducted by the cancer society? No, themissed the joy of her presence. This is our
guidelines came from a government appointedfamily's story, but there are thousands and
panel. Even though the examinations couldthousands of success stories with one thing in
continue to save lives, there are fewer cases ofcommon: early detection saves lives.
cancer in younger women; so the panel concludedThe task force issuing the guidelines was
that the costs and patient stress associated withappointed by the previous administration, but such
possible false positives did not pencil out in termspanels will become more powerful as the
of risks versus rewards.government becomes more involved in running
In the last year, $3.3 billion was spent onthe nation's health care system. Therefore, the
mammograms. If insurance companies andconcern is not about one set of guidelines for one
physicians adhere to the new guidelines, thisdeadly disease. It's about who has control over
expenditure will be greatly reduced. But whatour health care decisions. This is troubling to all of
about the person who does not benefit fromus, particularly pre-boomers on Medicare, because
early detection? They will be a statistic in theit could signal the beginning of rationing and the
government's data bank even though they areend of quality health care as we know it.
someone's daughter, sister, wife or mother. The