Breast Cancer Awareness Month: A Whole Lot of Hoopla

As breast cancer awareness month comes to aIf you are pre-menopausal, it will provide you
close, I find myself reflecting on a month ofvery little accuracy due to the density of the
grandstanding by an industry controlled bybreasts. And yet it is women between the ages
pharmaceutical drug companies designed to profitof 44 and 55 most at risk. Why is mammography
from women with disease. It is tragically a missedsuch a great achievement?
opportunity to provide real education onFACT: Mammography is prone to missing the
prevention, instead of merely promotingmost aggressive and life threatening types of
expensive diagnostic tools that some expertsbreast cancer while picking up tumors often found
believe to be inadequate and even carcinogenic.to be benign.
The American Cancer Society remains fixated onI am acquainted with a woman who was sick for
damage control. If decreasing the number ofa number of months but no doctor was able to
fatalities is truly its first priority, why not preventdiagnose what was wrong. She had a
the disease before it starts? The use of the wordmammogram performed in an effort to rule out
"awareness" rather than the more appropriatebreast cancer and no tumor was found. Five
word "prevention" is quite revealing. The bigweeks later when she was having difficulty raising
business of cancer is not about finding a cure.her right arm because of severe pain she met
FACT: Since 1940, the incidence of breast cancerwith another doctor and was then diagnosed with
has risen by one to two percent every year. Inbreast cancer, advanced stage four.
the past five decades, the incidence of breastSince that time, about four months ago now, this
cancer in females over 65 rose nearly 40% in thewoman has had countless chemotherapy sessions
United States.and I have watched her grow weaker with each
The American Cancer Society (ACS), held in suchpassing day – not from the cancer but
high esteem by so many, do more to squashfrom the treatment. She is almost unrecognizable.
legitimate natural approaches of cancer preventionThen she had a double mastectomy followed by
and treatment than a room full of chain smokerscountless radiation sessions. The next plan is to
– and they do this by using the FDA asput her on a drug called tamoxifen, known to
their mighty hammer. The ACS is no friend tohave serious side effects. In fact, a handful of
holistic medicine. In fact, this organization worksstudies demonstrate that the majority of women
directly against doctors offering viable naturalwho take tamoxifen live no longer than women
options, placing their names on a blacklist withoutwho refuse it. It is with great alarm that
even verifying the efficacy of their treatmentresearchers are finding some breast cancers
protocal. I realize this sort of talk is treading uponactually learn how to use tamoxifen to stimulate
sacred ground and I have no doubt thosetheir growth.
responsible for passing out pink ribbons will beI would like to focus on tamoxifen, since it is
appalled at my beliefs but as a 41 year oldtouted by the cancer industry as a great
woman at risk of developing this disease andaccomplishment in preventing breast cancer. Here
active in the holistic community, I have a right toare just a few of the more serious adverse side
be disgusted with this obvious lack of progresseffects associated with this drug: (1) some studies
and hypocrisy.have found that pre-menopausal users are at risk
FACT: Fewer than one in 10 cases of breastof developing accelerated bone mineral loss and
cancer occurs in women born with a geneticosteoporosis; (2) women using tamoxifen have
predisposition for the disease and as many asexperienced damaged retinas, increased corneal
50% of breast cancer cases remain unexplainedopacities, and decreased visual acuity as well as
by traditionally-accepted risk factors.irreversible corneal and retinal changes; (3) several
So what is causing the substantial increase instudies showed that the risk of developing
breast cancer? Epidemiologists and other scientistslife-threatening blood clots increased as much as
increasingly believe many cases of breast cancerseven times in women taking tamoxifen; (4)
are linked to environmental factors. If the ACSdepression; (5) asthma; (6) vocal cord changes;
would call on both government and industry to(7) liver cancer and liver disease as tamoxifen is
rethink the process by which new chemicals aretoxic to the liver and can cause acute hepatitis;
authorized for use and call for accountability, we(8) inducing a fast moving, lethal form of uterine
could make some real headway with regards tocancer – uterine growths such as polyps,
prevention.tumors, endometrial thickenings and cancers occur
For decades the ACS has spun tales of victories,in a significant number of women. One study
so small in reality they have done virtually nothingdetected abnormal endometrial cells in subjects
to alter the course of this deadly disease.the day after the first tablet was taken! It is
Meanwhile, chemical companies continue tointeresting to note that nearly every method of
develop insidious mixtures of cancer causingdiagnosing and treating breast cancer is a known
agents, spraying these chemicals on our food,carcinogen.
adding these chemicals to the water supply, andFACT: In a survey of 79 oncologists from McGill
the air we breathe. The ACS's financial ties withUniversity Cancer Center in Canada, 64 said they
industry clearly influence its policies pertaining towould not consent to treatment with Cisplatin, a
environmental causes of cancer and in somecommon chemotherapy drug, while 58 oncologists
cases have willfully suppressed information aboutsaid they would reject all the current trials being
environmental causes of cancer and is often silentcarried out by their establishment. Why?
on this issue, as is its accomplice, the FDA.“The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and
FACT: 9 out of 10 women will receive a falseits unacceptable degree of toxicity.” Philip
positive when screened for cancer, leading toDay, Cancer: Why We’re Still Dying to
anxiety, unnecessary surgical procedures, andKnow the Truth
toxic drugs.Millions of women right now are developing
A study performed on 500,000 women byundetectable, early-stage breast cancer, yet the
researchers at the Nordic Chochrane Center incancer industry does nothing until the tumor is
Denmark to determine whether or not cancerdetectable. Once detectable, an authoritative
screening offers any benefit, determined that forcancer specialist will push chemotherapy, radiation,
every one woman helped by breast cancersurgery and toxic drugs on a vulnerable patient.
screening, ten were harmed through falseNever mind that these methods cause
diagnosis leading to unnecessary treatments,permanent, irreversible harm to the brain, heart,
which could be devastating to their health. This isliver, kidneys and other organs. Does no one
partly due to the irradiation of breasts caused byquestion the lunacy of poisoning cells in a person
mammography, increasing a woman’swho needs their immune system to be strong?
chance for cancer but also because the numerousWhy are we so caught up in diagnosis when the
false positives lead to unnecessary biopsies andreal key is prevention? Is it because prevention
toxic treatment.would pay so little to the gluttonous industry of
Since the introduction of mammographicpharmaceutical drugs? Is it because it would shut
screening, the incidence of a form of breastdown the big business of cancer? Detection is not
cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) hasprevention and prevention requires personal
increased by 328%. It is believed that as much asresponsibility. It requires very little money and that
200% of this increase is due to mammography.does not work for the drug companies.
In addition to harmful radiation, mammographyIn an effort to reduce the risk of cancer, one
may also spread existing cancer cells due to theshould focus on strengthening the immune
considerable pressure placed on the breast duringsystem because there needs to be a break down
the procedure. According to health practitioners,in the immune system in the first place for cancer
this compression could actually cause existingcells to thrive. And as long as the FDA is unwilling
cancer cells to metastasize from the breastto hold industry responsible, detoxification of
tissue.harmful chemicals and heavy metals is of
Before writing this article, I spent some time onparamount importance and there are products
the web site for National Breast Canceravailable to help with this great challenge. It is also
Awareness Month, [ and found absolutely noimportant to make valuable food and lifestyle
information on prevention. It would seemchoices, and avoid exposure to cancer causing
mammography is the cancer industry's greatestchemicals. Do not wait until your doctor diagnoses
achievement and yet if you look outside theyou with cancer to make a radical change in your
information published by the ACS, you will find thislife. I encourage you to start protecting your
particular diagnostic tool to be woefully inadequate.health today.