Asbestosis Lung Cancer And Mesothelioma Rates As A Result Of Occupational Asbestos Exposure

are already aware, asbestos exposure has beenperiod of domestic exposure whereas the
linked to a number of life threatening diseases.remaining 224 married an asbestos cement
Most exposure related illnesses result from theworker only after he definitely stopped his
inhalation of tiny asbestos particles or fibers. Oneactivity in the asbestos cement plant; these have,
interesting study that examined the rate oftherefore, been considered as unexposed.
disease in miners is called, “Relation betweenThe cohort of wives was constructed entirely
asbestosis and bronchial cancer in amphibolethrough official records in the town offices and is
asbestos miners” by G K Sluis-Cremer, B Nboth exhaustive and unaffected by recall bias. At
Bezuidenhout - Br J Ind Med 1989;46:537-540 -the end of follow up (1988) 1669 women were
Epidemiology Research Unit, Medical Bureau ofalive, 270 were dead and 25 (1.2%) were
Occupational Disease, Johannesburg, Republic ofuntraced. Main mortality analyses were only up to
South Africa. Here is an excerpt: “Abstract - Inage 79 to reduce the misclassification of causes
a necropsy series of 339 amphibole asbestosof death. Expected mortality was based on local
miners heavy smoking, age, and the presence ofrates. Mortality analyses were limited to the period
asbestosis were significantly associated with the1965-88 due to the availability of local rates: in
presence of bronchial cancer. Of the 35 cases ofthat period 210 deaths occurred among women
bronchial cancer, 24 were associated withwith domestic exposure v 229.1 expected. There
asbestosis. Eleven cases of bronchial cancerwere four deaths from pleural tumours (one
occurred in men without asbestosis; all werediagnosed as mesothelioma at necropsis) and six
smokers. Standardised proportional mortality ratesfrom lung cancer v. 0.5 and 4.0 expected
indicated no excess of bronchial cancer in 302respectively. Two further cases of mesothelioma
exposed men without asbestosis whereas thesewere diagnosed by histological examination after
rates were progressively raised in men with slightthe end of follow up. None of the three wives
or moderate/severe asbestosis. Of the fourwith histologically diagnosed mesothelioma had
exposure variables introduced separately into abeen engaged in industrial activities. Corresponding
logistic regression model, "years of exposure"information for the other three cases could not
made a small but significant contribution;be traced.”
"residence time" marginally failed to achieve a 5%A third study is called, “Asbestosis: a marker
level of significance. Two other exposure variablesfor the increased risk of lung cancer among
tested including cumulative fibre exposure (fibreworkers exposed to asbestos.” By Weiss W. -
years) made no significant contribution. In theChest. 1999 Feb;115(2):536-49. Here is an excerpt:
absence of asbestosis at necropsy a bronchial“Abstract - This review examines the
cancer in a man exposed to asbestos is unlikelyhypothesis that excess lung cancer risk in worker
to be due to asbestos.”cohorts exposed to asbestos occurs only among
Another interesting study is called, “A cohortthose with asbestosis. The adequately designed
study on mortality among wives of workers instudies in the literature support this hypothesis.
the asbestos cement industry in CasaleThe summary relative risk for lung cancer was
Monferrato, Italy.” By C Magnani, B Terracini, C1.00 in seven cohorts with no deaths from
Ivaldi, M Botta, P Budel, A Mancini, R Zanettiasbestosis. In addition, there is a high correlation
— Br J Ind Med 1993; 50:779-784 - Here isbetween asbestosis rates and lung cancer rates in
an excerpt “Abstract - The study investigates38 cohorts in contrast to a poor correlation
mortality from cancer and other diseases in abetween cumulative exposure data and lung
cohort of wives of asbestos cement workers incancer relative risks in eight cohorts with
Casale Monferrato (northwest Italy). After theadequate data. The evidence indicates that
exclusion of women with an occupational record inasbestosis is a much better predictor of excess
the asbestos cement industry, the cohortlung cancer risk than measures of exposure and
comprised 1964 women. Their domestic exposureserves as a marker for attributable cases.”
was estimated according to their husbands'If you found any of these excerpts interesting,
periods of employment in the plant: 1740 had aplease read the studies in their entirety.